AUCTORES
Globalize your Research
Case Report | DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/2690-8794/066
*Corresponding Author: Priyanka Mishra, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, India.
Citation: Mishra P, Gupta B. and Parameswaran P., (2021) A case of bradycardia and hypersensitivity with intravenous ketamine monotherapy. Clinical Medical Reviews and Reports 3(2); DOI: 10.31579/2690-8794/066
Copyright: © 2021 Priyanka Mishra, This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Received: 25 January 2021 | Accepted: 13 February 2021 | Published: 20 February 2021
Keywords: bradycardia; hypersensitivity; intravenous ketamine monotherapy
Anaphylaxis during anesthesia is an unforeseeable and potentially life threatening syndrome that is dose independent. Ketamine is a widely used hypnotic for procedural sedation in the emergency department, in anesthesia and intensive care units (ICU). It is popularly employed for both children and adult patients. Though, dose dependent adverse effects of ketamine have been described, the hypersensitive reactions with the same are extremely rare. We are hereby presenting a case of an allergic reaction and isolated bradycardia with ketamine, given as intravenous monotherapy in a patient with no previous history of atopic disease. Our article aims at reminding all the medical professionals to never let a drug (however commonly used) throw away caution, be vigilant to timely diagnose an adverse drug reaction (even the most infrequent and rare) and be prepared to tackle the worst with the necessary supportive measures like hemodynamic support and advanced airway procedures.
The incidence of anaphylactic reactions during anesthesia ranges between 1 in 4000 to 1 in 25,000 and the mortality is estimated to be between 3 to 6% [1]. These are commonly seen with latex, neuromuscular blockers, opioids, antibiotics and blood transfusion etc. Though, dose dependent adverse effects of ketamine have been described, the hypersensitive reactions with the same are extremely rare. After taking informed consent for possible publication in literature, we are presenting such a rare case of intravenous ketamine allergy accompanied with bradycardia.
A 53 year old, 52 kg female patient was posted for incisional hernia repair under general anesthesia. She had an uneventful history of two caesarean section and one hernia surgery in the past. The anesthetic records of these surgeries were unavailable. Our anesthesia team was conducting a study regarding propofol induced pain in which intravenous (IV) ketamine was one of the test drugs. Post randomization, this patient was allocated to the ketamine receiving group. The study involved achieving venous stasis by inflating a tourniquet on the arm in which the selected drug would be given. Inside the operating room, the baseline vitals were recorded as heart rate (HR) - 62/min, Blood pressure – 106/64mm Hg and oxygen saturation (spO2) of 99% on air. After securing venous access and tourniquet inflation at 100mm Hg, we began to give the sub-anesthetic dose of ketamine (15mg) IV. Patient immediately complained of burning sensation and itching over the forearm so further administration was stopped and tourniquet released.We noticed red macular spots that evolved into morbilliform, blanchable rash over the forearm and hand below the tourniquet. There was a transient fall in HR to 45/min that resolved spontaneously. However, there was no associated change in respiration or blood pressure. Suspecting an allergic reaction to the given drug, we gave inj. hydrocortisone 100 mg and inj. pheniramine 45.5 mg IV stat. This was followed by regression of rash. Patient was then induced and surgery commenced. Patient was extubated uneventfully at the end of procedure. However, still the rash had not resolved completely.
Ketamine hypersensitivity test was done later by an intradermal injection of 1mg/ml ketamine both 2 days and 6 weeks after surgery.
Differential diagnosis
The possibility of these lesions being petechiae induced by the tourniquet was ruled out as they were blanchable and the coagulation profile and platelet count was normal in the patient.
Outcome and follow-up
While the control using normal saline was negative (Figure 1), redness with eruption of size 13 mm and 12 mm respectively at 2 days and 6 weeks with ketamine confirmed positive tests (Figure 2).
Based on the clinical history, examination and investigations, we formed a diagnosis of ketamine induced hypersensitivity.
Ketamine, a phencyclidine derivative, is a commonly used agent in both children and adults for sedation, analgesia and intravenous induction. Despite frequent use, the hypersensitivity reactions to ketamine appear to be extremely rare. A meta-analysis by Bellolio et al. revealed no cases of anaphylaxis in 13,883 pediatric sedations, most of whom received ketamine [2]. Common side effects of ketamine include over-sedation, tachycardia, increased secretions, vomiting, laryngospasm, confusion and hallucinations. Bradycardia and hypotension are very infrequent side effects. There are few case reports on allergy and anaphylaxis but most of them involved co-administration of other agents. Bylund et al have described anaphylaxis by intramuscular ketamine as monotherapy [3]. In another case report, an allergic reaction with intravenous ketamine infusion for procedural sedation in the emergency department has been documented [4]. Several factors make the assessment of allergic response in an anesthetic-related reaction difficult. These include the fact that induction drugs are generally administered in quick succession rendering it difficult to identify the actual culprit for hypersensitivity and the clinical manifestations like tachycardia or hypotension can get altered by these concomitantly administered drugs. Draping may prevent the early detection of signs like urticaria or angioedema. It should be noted that history of atopic disease constitutes a risk factor for development of drug allergy and thus, shall be carefully inquired in the pre-anesthetic evaluation. Guyer et al. showed that 55% of patients reported drug allergy history, 48% of them had history of allergic rhinitis, 32% were diagnosed asthmatic, 15% reported a positive history of a severe allergic reaction [5].
We are presenting a case of hypersensitivity to ketamine in a female patient with no previous history of allergy or atopy. As no other drug was administered to the patient before ketamine, the suspicion of ketamine allergy was high. Owing to the low dose of drug given and tourniquet inflation leading to venous stasis in our case, severe systemic response was prevented. Hence, we did not confront life-threatening respiratory or cardiovascular compromise in our case. The transient isolated bradycardia (without other cardiovascular abnormalities) that was witnessed resolved spontaneously. Sheth et al have postulated that oldage, lower baseline vitals, and non-trauma patients are more likely to predict the occurrence of bradycardia after ketamine injection [6]. We believe that the old age and low baseline heart rate could have resulted into the bradycardia response. Benzethonium chloride was the preservative in our ketamine supply. The hypersensitivity test with benzethonium chloride came out to be negative. None of the other patients who were given ketamine from the same vial had any allergic response. There can be development of morbilliform petechial eruption due to tourniquet inflation in thrombocytopenic patients [7]. However, the blanching character of the rash and normal platelet count ruled out that suspicion. The differential diagnosis in our case may include an allergic reaction to latex or ketamine. Latex allergy was ruled out by the history of uneventful previous surgeries where latex gloves were used. Ketamine hypersensitivity was later confirmed by a positive intradermal test. Tryptase level assessment was not available in our institute. The skin testing can be conducted at least four to six weeks after the occurrence of a suspected perioperative allergic reaction, thus allowing for the clearance of suspected drugs and anti-allergic medications [8]. We had attained positive results for ketamine sensitivity in both the tests done on second day and six weeks post operatively. The symptoms in our patient and their improvement with anti-histaminics and steroids were consistent with activation of mast cells and release of mediators like histamine. The Naranjo Adverse Drug Reaction Probability Score was ten indicating a definite ketamine related adverse drug reaction. (Table 1)
Total score in our case - 10 (DEFINITE)
1 Doubtful
1-4 - Possible
5-8- Probabe
>9 – Definite
Few studies indicate that ketamine induced allergy is mediated by histamine release and the evidence indicated against an IgE mediated response. However, whether this was the sole mechanism cannot be declared with certainty as there was not complete resolution of rash despite before said treatment. As ketamine does not have a reversal agent, once administered, the physician must be ready to handle the consequences. The only feature of anaphylaxis may be characterized by airway obstruction or cardiovascular collapse in the perioperative period. After an adverse drug reaction, the agent should be discontinued at the earliest. Adequate oxygenation with 100% oxygen, antihistaminic agents (diphenhydramine, pheniramine), corticosteroids (dexamethasone, hydrocortisone), bronchodilators and epinephrine may be administered to control the allergic response. It is essential to avoid the allergen for all future purposes. To the best of our knowledge, there is no published literature documenting incidence of bradycardia with intravenous ketamine hypersensitivity.
Our report aims to send a reminder to all the medical professionals to be highly vigilant and prepared for the rare potentially fatal allergic responses to commonly used drugs. Isolated bradycardia (in absence of other cardiorespiratory abnormalities) and hypersensitivity with intravenous ketamine is a very rare occurrence. All necessary supportive measures like hemodynamic support and advanced airway procedures shall be readily available to efficiently tackle such situations.
Learning points/take home messages
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported
Not applicable.
None.
Clearly Auctoresonline and particularly Psychology and Mental Health Care Journal is dedicated to improving health care services for individuals and populations. The editorial boards' ability to efficiently recognize and share the global importance of health literacy with a variety of stakeholders. Auctoresonline publishing platform can be used to facilitate of optimal client-based services and should be added to health care professionals' repertoire of evidence-based health care resources.
Journal of Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention The submission and review process was adequate. However I think that the publication total value should have been enlightened in early fases. Thank you for all.
Journal of Women Health Care and Issues By the present mail, I want to say thank to you and tour colleagues for facilitating my published article. Specially thank you for the peer review process, support from the editorial office. I appreciate positively the quality of your journal.
Journal of Clinical Research and Reports I would be very delighted to submit my testimonial regarding the reviewer board and the editorial office. The reviewer board were accurate and helpful regarding any modifications for my manuscript. And the editorial office were very helpful and supportive in contacting and monitoring with any update and offering help. It was my pleasure to contribute with your promising Journal and I am looking forward for more collaboration.
We would like to thank the Journal of Thoracic Disease and Cardiothoracic Surgery because of the services they provided us for our articles. The peer-review process was done in a very excellent time manner, and the opinions of the reviewers helped us to improve our manuscript further. The editorial office had an outstanding correspondence with us and guided us in many ways. During a hard time of the pandemic that is affecting every one of us tremendously, the editorial office helped us make everything easier for publishing scientific work. Hope for a more scientific relationship with your Journal.
The peer-review process which consisted high quality queries on the paper. I did answer six reviewers’ questions and comments before the paper was accepted. The support from the editorial office is excellent.
Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. I had the experience of publishing a research article recently. The whole process was simple from submission to publication. The reviewers made specific and valuable recommendations and corrections that improved the quality of my publication. I strongly recommend this Journal.
Dr. Katarzyna Byczkowska My testimonial covering: "The peer review process is quick and effective. The support from the editorial office is very professional and friendly. Quality of the Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on cardiology that is useful for other professionals in the field.
Thank you most sincerely, with regard to the support you have given in relation to the reviewing process and the processing of my article entitled "Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of The Prostate Gland: A Review and Update" for publication in your esteemed Journal, Journal of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics". The editorial team has been very supportive.
Testimony of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology: work with your Reviews has been a educational and constructive experience. The editorial office were very helpful and supportive. It was a pleasure to contribute to your Journal.
Dr. Bernard Terkimbi Utoo, I am happy to publish my scientific work in Journal of Women Health Care and Issues (JWHCI). The manuscript submission was seamless and peer review process was top notch. I was amazed that 4 reviewers worked on the manuscript which made it a highly technical, standard and excellent quality paper. I appreciate the format and consideration for the APC as well as the speed of publication. It is my pleasure to continue with this scientific relationship with the esteem JWHCI.
This is an acknowledgment for peer reviewers, editorial board of Journal of Clinical Research and Reports. They show a lot of consideration for us as publishers for our research article “Evaluation of the different factors associated with side effects of COVID-19 vaccination on medical students, Mutah university, Al-Karak, Jordan”, in a very professional and easy way. This journal is one of outstanding medical journal.
Dear Hao Jiang, to Journal of Nutrition and Food Processing We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything else we should do, please do not hesitate to let us know. On behalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
As an author who has recently published in the journal "Brain and Neurological Disorders". I am delighted to provide a testimonial on the peer review process, editorial office support, and the overall quality of the journal. The peer review process at Brain and Neurological Disorders is rigorous and meticulous, ensuring that only high-quality, evidence-based research is published. The reviewers are experts in their fields, and their comments and suggestions were constructive and helped improve the quality of my manuscript. The review process was timely and efficient, with clear communication from the editorial office at each stage. The support from the editorial office was exceptional throughout the entire process. The editorial staff was responsive, professional, and always willing to help. They provided valuable guidance on formatting, structure, and ethical considerations, making the submission process seamless. Moreover, they kept me informed about the status of my manuscript and provided timely updates, which made the process less stressful. The journal Brain and Neurological Disorders is of the highest quality, with a strong focus on publishing cutting-edge research in the field of neurology. The articles published in this journal are well-researched, rigorously peer-reviewed, and written by experts in the field. The journal maintains high standards, ensuring that readers are provided with the most up-to-date and reliable information on brain and neurological disorders. In conclusion, I had a wonderful experience publishing in Brain and Neurological Disorders. The peer review process was thorough, the editorial office provided exceptional support, and the journal's quality is second to none. I would highly recommend this journal to any researcher working in the field of neurology and brain disorders.
Dear Agrippa Hilda, Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery, Editorial Coordinator, I trust this message finds you well. I want to extend my appreciation for considering my article for publication in your esteemed journal. I am pleased to provide a testimonial regarding the peer review process and the support received from your editorial office. The peer review process for my paper was carried out in a highly professional and thorough manner. The feedback and comments provided by the authors were constructive and very useful in improving the quality of the manuscript. This rigorous assessment process undoubtedly contributes to the high standards maintained by your journal.
International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews. I strongly recommend to consider submitting your work to this high-quality journal. The support and availability of the Editorial staff is outstanding and the review process was both efficient and rigorous.
Thank you very much for publishing my Research Article titled “Comparing Treatment Outcome Of Allergic Rhinitis Patients After Using Fluticasone Nasal Spray And Nasal Douching" in the Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. As Medical Professionals we are immensely benefited from study of various informative Articles and Papers published in this high quality Journal. I look forward to enriching my knowledge by regular study of the Journal and contribute my future work in the field of ENT through the Journal for use by the medical fraternity. The support from the Editorial office was excellent and very prompt. I also welcome the comments received from the readers of my Research Article.
Dear Erica Kelsey, Editorial Coordinator of Cancer Research and Cellular Therapeutics Our team is very satisfied with the processing of our paper by your journal. That was fast, efficient, rigorous, but without unnecessary complications. We appreciated the very short time between the submission of the paper and its publication on line on your site.
I am very glad to say that the peer review process is very successful and fast and support from the Editorial Office. Therefore, I would like to continue our scientific relationship for a long time. And I especially thank you for your kindly attention towards my article. Have a good day!
"We recently published an article entitled “Influence of beta-Cyclodextrins upon the Degradation of Carbofuran Derivatives under Alkaline Conditions" in the Journal of “Pesticides and Biofertilizers” to show that the cyclodextrins protect the carbamates increasing their half-life time in the presence of basic conditions This will be very helpful to understand carbofuran behaviour in the analytical, agro-environmental and food areas. We greatly appreciated the interaction with the editor and the editorial team; we were particularly well accompanied during the course of the revision process, since all various steps towards publication were short and without delay".
I would like to express my gratitude towards you process of article review and submission. I found this to be very fair and expedient. Your follow up has been excellent. I have many publications in national and international journal and your process has been one of the best so far. Keep up the great work.
We are grateful for this opportunity to provide a glowing recommendation to the Journal of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. We found that the editorial team were very supportive, helpful, kept us abreast of timelines and over all very professional in nature. The peer review process was rigorous, efficient and constructive that really enhanced our article submission. The experience with this journal remains one of our best ever and we look forward to providing future submissions in the near future.
I am very pleased to serve as EBM of the journal, I hope many years of my experience in stem cells can help the journal from one way or another. As we know, stem cells hold great potential for regenerative medicine, which are mostly used to promote the repair response of diseased, dysfunctional or injured tissue using stem cells or their derivatives. I think Stem Cell Research and Therapeutics International is a great platform to publish and share the understanding towards the biology and translational or clinical application of stem cells.
I would like to give my testimony in the support I have got by the peer review process and to support the editorial office where they were of asset to support young author like me to be encouraged to publish their work in your respected journal and globalize and share knowledge across the globe. I really give my great gratitude to your journal and the peer review including the editorial office.
I am delighted to publish our manuscript entitled "A Perspective on Cocaine Induced Stroke - Its Mechanisms and Management" in the Journal of Neuroscience and Neurological Surgery. The peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal are excellent. The manuscripts published are of high quality and of excellent scientific value. I recommend this journal very much to colleagues.
Dr.Tania Muñoz, My experience as researcher and author of a review article in The Journal Clinical Cardiology and Interventions has been very enriching and stimulating. The editorial team is excellent, performs its work with absolute responsibility and delivery. They are proactive, dynamic and receptive to all proposals. Supporting at all times the vast universe of authors who choose them as an option for publication. The team of review specialists, members of the editorial board, are brilliant professionals, with remarkable performance in medical research and scientific methodology. Together they form a frontline team that consolidates the JCCI as a magnificent option for the publication and review of high-level medical articles and broad collective interest. I am honored to be able to share my review article and open to receive all your comments.
“The peer review process of JPMHC is quick and effective. Authors are benefited by good and professional reviewers with huge experience in the field of psychology and mental health. The support from the editorial office is very professional. People to contact to are friendly and happy to help and assist any query authors might have. Quality of the Journal is scientific and publishes ground-breaking research on mental health that is useful for other professionals in the field”.
Dear editorial department: On behalf of our team, I hereby certify the reliability and superiority of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews in the peer review process, editorial support, and journal quality. Firstly, the peer review process of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is rigorous, fair, transparent, fast, and of high quality. The editorial department invites experts from relevant fields as anonymous reviewers to review all submitted manuscripts. These experts have rich academic backgrounds and experience, and can accurately evaluate the academic quality, originality, and suitability of manuscripts. The editorial department is committed to ensuring the rigor of the peer review process, while also making every effort to ensure a fast review cycle to meet the needs of authors and the academic community. Secondly, the editorial team of the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is composed of a group of senior scholars and professionals with rich experience and professional knowledge in related fields. The editorial department is committed to assisting authors in improving their manuscripts, ensuring their academic accuracy, clarity, and completeness. Editors actively collaborate with authors, providing useful suggestions and feedback to promote the improvement and development of the manuscript. We believe that the support of the editorial department is one of the key factors in ensuring the quality of the journal. Finally, the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is renowned for its high- quality articles and strict academic standards. The editorial department is committed to publishing innovative and academically valuable research results to promote the development and progress of related fields. The International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews is reasonably priced and ensures excellent service and quality ratio, allowing authors to obtain high-level academic publishing opportunities in an affordable manner. I hereby solemnly declare that the International Journal of Clinical Case Reports and Reviews has a high level of credibility and superiority in terms of peer review process, editorial support, reasonable fees, and journal quality. Sincerely, Rui Tao.
Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions I testity the covering of the peer review process, support from the editorial office, and quality of the journal.
